grandiloquent stadium light shine through swarm of fly insects , illuminating the speedway on a fond , muggy night . Thousands of people tamp down the standpoint . Their head swivel as race cars round the turns , whizz by and then do it all over again . A low murmur from the crew explodes into raucous cheers as one auto passes another , narrowly fend off a hit . It ’s just another action - packed night at the track — or is it ?

One lap to go . The fan are on their foundation , holler aloud as the car chouse for position . As the leaders roar around the final turn and channelize into the rest home stretchiness , it ’s clear there ’s going to be a photo finish . simple inches separate the winner from the Caranx crysos - up as they voyage under the checkered flag . The crowd goes waste !

That ’s when you acknowledge something strange . As the first - place car slows to take its victory circle , it becomes apparent that no one is in the driver ’s ass . Is the car remotely controlled ? Did the driver jump out ? Nope . Incredibly , the car is drive itself .

While this scenario has n’t yet play out in actual life story , it ’s only a subject of meter until it does . Engineers have made incredible progress in the intent and examination ofdriverless carssince the first prototypes were wind out in the 1970s . Perhaps most notably , Google ’s self - driving gondola project has lumber more than 1.3 million miles of software package - controlled driving from 2009 to December 2015 [ rootage : Google ] . And , because this is America , engineers have already tried race their cosmos , albeit in individual metre run , not like a shot against one another .

So how did driverless car racing get started ? How isracingthese cars down a racecourse any different from driving them down the freeway ? Will driverless car racing eventually put professional drivers out of a business ? We ’ll run down these questions and more , but we ’re leaving the driving to you . So take hold of that shiner and tap !

Origins of Driverless Car Racing

Obviously , driverless cars were n’t excogitate just so we could race them around a track . Sure , that ’s jolly awesome , but the real reason was more practical . If cars drove themselves , hoi polloi who bank on others for transportation because of age or disability could have much more independence , not to observe your ordinary commuter train , who could have more time to relax . As an added bonus , driverless cars could easecongestion , cut down accident , lower fuel consumption and even alleviate the need for parking .

The idea for a driverless car can be hunt all the manner back toLeonardo da Vinci , who outline a pre - programmable go-cart in 1478 ( seriously , what did n’t that guy believe of ? ) . But it was n’t until General Motors ' " Futurama " display premiere at the 1939 World ’s Fair that driverless motorcar really clear public aid . The exhibit was a scurf model of how the world might await in 1960 , as envision by GM , and prominent on its flyspeck freeways were cars that drove themselves . Early endeavour to actually evolve this technology in the 1950s concentrate on so - called smart highways , which were road embedded with steel cable that railway car could observe and follow [ sources : VanderbiltandWeber ] .

Today ’s driverless automobile , which navigate roads using sensors and computers to scan and render the environs , came out of the 1970s . That ’s when engineers from Japan ’s Tsukuba Mechanical Engineering Laboratory successfully programmed a car fit out with two tv camera and an analogue computer to follow bloodless road marking at the blaze f number of 18.6 nautical mile per hour ( 30 kilometers per hour ) , though a steel runway avail it along [ source : Weber ] . Over the next couple of decades , however , university and companionship across the public take advantage of improvement in computing machine engineering science to create driverless cars that actually perform quite well in real - world route tests .

In 2003 the United States military machine , under the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ( DARPA ) , decided these cars were quick to rush along . More specifically , they hope that challenging driverless car researchers to vie against one another would spur innovation in a engineering science that could potentially have important military applications . Thus the DARPA Grand Challenge was born . With a $ 1 million prize on the descent , teams gather in the California desert in 2004 to loose their ultimate autonomous speed machine , and the results were , well , interesting [ source : Shipley ] . But before we get into that , lease ’s talk about the technology it takes to build a driverless race railroad car .

Driverless Race Car Technology

It ’s probably not surprising that the applied science in driverless race cars is similar to that in your runnel - of - the - mill autonomous ( or even semi - autonomous ) gondola . That ’s because navigating on aracetrackand cruise down a highway are alike in many fundamental ways : Both require you to keep out from other cars , stay on a designated line and avoid unexpected obstruction . Even more advance racing skills , like taking a street corner as fast as possible without spinning out , can be likened to taking a turn on an icy expressway . Still , driverless race car confront alone challenges , and applied scientist have come up with some pretty genius agency to deal with them .

A typical driverless railroad car uses a variety of sensors to observe its milieu . Radarsensors placed around the car can notice the fomite ’s place in relationship to the railway car around it . television cameras help keep caterpillar tread of nearby dealings , but they also read traffic sparkle and route signs , and help the car avoid obstacles like pedestrians . Lidar — or lightheaded radio detection and ranging — bounce pulses of light off the auto ’s environment to make a three - dimensional vista that ’s useful for key lane mark and the edge of the route . A computer pull all this data together and manipulate the steerage , acceleration and brake consequently [ source : Armstrong ] .

Racing demands even more from a driverless car . pass on the higher speeds , acceleration andbrakingare much harder , and there ’s far less chemical reaction time . Techniques like determining the good line through a turn , fighting for spot and overcompensate for load shifting during steering are also necessary . Many of these skills are instinctual for slipstream car driver , but driverless cars can get it mighty only if they ’re programmed with the proper algorithm [ source : Adams ] .

So what ’s a racing - challenged engineer to do ?

They take a feel into the heads of airstream car drivers — literally . One research squad at Stanford actually hook drivers up to electrodes that metric Einstein activity as they hie against other auto . selective information gleaned from this experiment helped the applied scientist hunky-dory - tune the information processing system systems of the driverless race automobile . For example , by examining the human driver ' instinctive answer when the fomite spins out on a turn , engineers were able to better the timing of the software system that help stabilize the motorcar [ source : Knapton ] .

Driverless Car Races

Has all this public lecture of driverless car racing got your inner geek ready for the green flag ? Well , do n’t get too excited , because there are still some kinks to work out before the sport is ready for quality time .

Sure , engineers have been racing these vehicles for more than a decennium , but it has n’t always been activeness - packed . Take the first official driverless railcar race , an off - road contest known as the 2004 DARPA Grand Challenge ( we mentioned it earlier but left you hang about the upshot ) . Of the 15 squad that started , only six actually made it out of the starting slideway without going bonkers . Those that made it out were capable to journey between 1.2 and 7.4 international mile ( 1.9 to 11.9 kilometers ) before start out stuck on a rock , reel into a fence or meeting some other opprobrious demise . Those results are even more cringe - desirable when you consider the course was 142 miles long [ source : Hooper ] .

To be bonny , the DARPA Grand Challenge is about encouraging technical advancement , and by that bar the 2005 race did not let down . Twenty - three vehicles entered this time , and four managed to make it down the 132 - mile class within the 10 - hour time limit . " Stanley , " the car from Stanford University , finished first with a time of six hour , 53 minute , and 58 second gear . It was an astonishing technical attainment , but at an ordinary focal ratio of 19.1 geographical mile per hour ( 30.7 kilometers per hr ) , it was hardly the marrow - ram down military action race fan are used to [ seed : Hanlon ] .

The last DARPA driverless cable car wash was theUrban Challengeheld in 2007 . This metre Carnegie Mellon ’s squad quiver out 10 other contender to take home the $ 2 million first prize , dispatch the 60 - Admiralty mile course 20 minute ahead of the next closer . Again , pep pill were slow : only 14 stat mi per 60 minutes ( 22.5 kilometer per minute ) on average . Perhaps the big bummer for race lover , however , was that the cars were judged on how well they followed dealings convention . What sort of slipstream is that ? [ generator : Sofge ]

Race enthusiast will be happy to roll in the hay that engine driver are now working on driverless race cars that can go much , much quicker . Stanford University ’s Audi TTS , dub " Shelley , " has get a mess of attention late — and for good reason . In February 2015 it became the first driverless slipstream railroad car to shell a human race railcar gadget driver , beating out recreational touring stratum booster David Vodden at California ’s Thunderhill Raceway Park by 0.4 arcsecond [ source : Knapton ] .

The Future of Driverless Car Racing

After listen about the current state of driverless car racing , motorsport fans are probably thinking , " That ’s somewhat nerveless , but when are we go to see some substantial racing ? " Great question . And you ’ll be happy to hear that the solvent is shortly .

In November 2015 , Formula E , a racing class for electric car , announced Roborace , an outside racing circuit for driverless electrical vehicle . The program is to hold these races before each Formula E case , beginning with the 2016 - 2017 season . Roborace will have 10 teams using selfsame cars , so the competition will actually arrive down to the different sensors and computer algorithms team engineers create to make the elevator car self-reliant . And the skilful intelligence for racing fans ? One of the issue ’s founders assure speeds as in high spirits as 186 miles per 60 minutes ( 299.3 km per hour ) [ source : Davy ] .

But will anyone watch it ? That ’s the big question raised by many of Roborace ’s critics . These doubters feel that if you take the human ingredient out of racing , it becomes less interesting and perhaps does n’t even stipulate as a sport . It ’s the strategical miscalculations and the crashes that multitude tune in to see , so what will pass off if estimator are fine - tuned to ward off these mistakes ? What will speed be without the drivers ' emotional celebrations in the winner ’s circle ? There ’s even some business organisation that driverless cars will become so good at bucket along that human drivers will become obsolete .

Not everyone agree , however . Supporters fence that this case of competition will really make the mutant much more appealing by attracting a new character of fan that did n’t really care much for racing before . And as for the human factor , Roborace counsellor do n’t see that going aside , either . They hope the engineer will take on that office , in the end savour some of the public eye after being holed away in a testing ground for much of their careers [ source : Fagnan ] .

In the end , the head of Formula E does n’t see his Roborace as the close of motorsports . Rather , he want fans and competition to get aroused about initiation — and maybe have a little fun in the process [ source : Khorounzhiy ] .

Lots More Information

I ’ve been casually following what ’s going on with driverless automobile , but the notion of bucket along them is a novel , and unquestionably awesome , concept to me . While research this clause , I found myself being distracted by YouTube videos of the early DARPA races and other adventures in autonomous racing . Now that I know there ’s belong to be a new driverless racing serial publication , I ’m very concerned in seeing it . I guess that make me one of those new fans race promoter hop to draw to the sportswoman !

Sources